Libya broke free in 1969.
Imperialists have repeatedly tried to regain control ever since. Though under
imperialist embargoes and attacks much of the time, Myammar al-Gaddafi, the
leader of that revolution, modernized Libya beyond the living standards of
England.
Besides free education
(including advanced education anywhere in the world), free health care, most
adults owning a car, and providing each marrying couple a $50,000 interest free
loan, large sums of Libyan money was spent to keep alive Africa’s post WWII
dream of forming into “The United States of Africa.” Substantial funds were
spent developing some of the smaller nations in central Africa. And Libya’s
leader did all this without amassing personal wealth.
His latest proposal was
to nationalize the oil companies and turn the massive profits currently flowing
out of the country towards Libyan workers and the poor. These proposals were
sitting in front of Libya’s citizen councils (their system of grass roots
democracy) when imperialism attacked.
If put in force, she
would have the highest standard of living in the world, and there would be no
such thing as a “poor” person in Libya.
Ghadaffi was so revered
for having gained Libya’s freedom, no ethnic group or political coalition could
be found to fund, arm, train, and overthrow him.
However, under the
umbrella of populist revolutions overthrowing puppets throughout the Arab
world, and with the urgency of preventing such an example to the periphery of
empire currently breaking free, such a group was covertly organized.
Only the most naive would
believe a ragtag, poorly armed, untrained, motley mass would drive cars,
pickups, and trucks several hundred miles West on a coastal highway openly
declaring they were going to overthrow a government with a well-equipped and
trained army.
Imperialism obviously
informed this hotbed of Al-Qaeda recruits they would back a revolution to put
them in power.”
A plastic gun shown to
NBC reporter Richard Engle by an insurgent supposedly in battle, exposed this
as a photo op by those covert organizers to gain the loyalty of the world for
this assault on Libya by imperialism.
One hundred British
covert operation forces inserted into the Benghazi area three weeks before
their rag tag assault, quickly expanding to 350, and the man in charge of the
uprising, Khalifa Hifter, having lived in Virginia, next door to the CIA for 20
years, is further confirmation.
Those insurgents were
promised backing by the world’s most powerful nations for them to rule Libya.
Meanwhile mainstream news, which surely has access to far more information than
we do, told the world this was a spontaneous, homegrown, insurrection.
Even with NATO
headquartered there, Germany recognized the moral hazard of the unjust
collective assault on Libya and quickly withdrew from the coalition.
On April 1, 2011, Asia
Times exposed the assault on Libya was part of an agreement between America and
Saudi Arabia. In trade for the Saudis protecting America’s puppets in Bahrain
and having their fully controlled Arab League vote yes on UN Security Council
Resolution 1973, approving a no fly zone over Libya, America and NATO agreed to
take out Ghadaffi.
The destruction of
Ghadaffi’s Libya was to protect Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Yemen, and other puppet
governments, from the populist Arab revolutions breaking out throughout the
Middle East.
But these were only minor
aspects of a much bigger problem for imperialism. Libya’s ongoing study on
nationalizing all oil operations within their borders, their organization of
several African countries for central banks independent of current world
currencies, switching to the gold dinar as Africa’s common currency, and the
selling of oil for those gold dinars.
All that, plus Ghadaffi’s
outspoken efforts for true democracy within the United Nations, would lead to
the overthrow of puppet governments worldwide, the potential success of the
60-year plan for a United States of Africa, and the end of theft-capitalism.
Communication
superhighways are spreading truth so fast that most the leading thinkers of all
nations realize this is imperialism’s attempt to keep the current populist
revolutionists trapped within the imperial system.
Much of the world
breaking free, in concert with the worldwide financial collapse, would mean the
end of theft capitalism that we have been predicting. China, India, Russia,
Brazil, Venezuela, and most other nations currently breaking free, are fully
aware R2P is just as much to control them as it is to control those populist
revolutions.
The absolute rule, to
never share technology with anyone, was broken when imperial industries moved
to China wholesale
As a result of that
breach in the monopolization of technology, within one more generation, much of
the world will be developed. Their development automatically leads to a demand for
equality in world trade and they retaining their share of the world’s
production of wealth.
R2P is imperialism’s
effort to head off this oncoming disaster. Imperialism is getting steadily
weaker while the periphery of empire is getting stronger and stronger.
All people are good and
populations of the imperial centers would never accept their governments
creating such havoc across the world if they knew the truth.
An honest look at history
200 years ago is very instructive. We all know that Napoleon was a megalomaniac
dictator, right? Reading the cover story of the April 22, 1991 US News and
World Report, History’s Hidden Turning Points by Daniel J. Boorstin,
will quickly push aside the pure propaganda, pushed in all imperialist history
books, on the subject of Napoleon.
He spread many of the
rights declared for all men by the French Revolution throughout Europe. Known
as the Napoleonic Codes, “they are the legal basis for over thirty nations of
Europe today.”
Those codes were a direct
threat to both Aristocracy and the church, the power structure of the time.
Thus, even as those powers were severely proscribed, and because those they had
control of the universities and would eventually regain control of the media,
their dictatorial powers were not eliminated.
Thus Napoleon, who can
only have been worshiped for many decades throughout those 30 plus nations he
liberated, are recorded by imperialist historians as a megalomaniac and
dictator, the very attributes of the current power-structure promoting
themselves as peaceful, free, democracies.
The demonizing of Libya
today, and every other nation threatening to throw off the yoke of imperialism,
as we have demonstrated above, is the exact same process under which Napoleon’s
reputation was destroyed.
Just as Napoleon freed
most of Europe, communications superhighways and the rapid development of the
peripheries of collapsing empires is freeing the world. That is, assuming those
megalomaniacs do not destroy it first.
Imperialism will probably
win this round also. However, most the emerging world realizes how close they
came to being free—they have China, India, Russia, Brazil to collaborate with
to further develop their strength—and sooner or later imperialism/theft-capitalism
will lose this struggle.
No comments:
Post a Comment