But Kenya’s exchange rate woes are just the tip of the
iceberg. Kenya’s big challenge is to reduce the gap between the
import bill and exports revenues, what economists call the “current account
deficit” (which remains large, even when services—such as
tourism—are included). Last year, the deficit reached more than ten percent of
GDP, approximately Ksh 400 billion (US$ 4.5 billion). This is larger than
Greece’s.
In order to balance its current account, Kenya would have
to more than double the volume of its three top exports—tea, tourism and
horticulture. In addition, Kenya is vulnerable to shocks, like increasing oil
prices. Oil is one of Kenya’s top imports, and the oil import bill
alone rose from $2.7 billion in 2010 to $4.1 billion in 2011, further weakening
Kenya’s fragile current account. A large current
account deficit does not automatically translate into a falling currency, so
long as capital inflows fill the gap. But in Kenya, capital inflows have
increasingly been short-term (by contrast to Foreign Direct Investment which
finances factories and offices). Short-term capital can leave a country as fast
as it comes, and this uncertainty is an additional source of fragility for the
national currency.
When the Central Bank increased interest rates sharply at
the end of last year, it brought the airplane into safety, cooling the engine
that was overheating. The price was some economic slowdown, as loans (which
businesses rely on to invest), became more expensive. Now that the plane has
emerged from turbulence, every attempt should be made to make it fly faster and
higher. Kenya’s first engine—domestic consumption—which is fuelling vibrant
service and construction sectors, has always been strong. But the second
engine—exports—needs to perform better. If not, Kenya will continue to operate
below potential, for years to come.
But how do you do that? What products could Kenya
realistically export? Picking winners is typically not a good idea. The
government needs to provide the conditions—such as infrastructure, the rule of
law, and basic social services—for businesses to thrive, but not run them. At
the same time, it is clear that Kenya needs to move into new products, because
it cannot grow rich on tea and flowers alone. The natural starting point is
manufacturing. Kenya has a good location and a skilled labor force, which is
rapidly urbanizing. The global manufacturing market is also changing. Today,
Asia is the world’s workshop, producing almost everything from clothes, shoes,
toys and increasingly cars. But Asia’s economic success translates into higher
wages, and many manufacturing jobs will soon leave its emerging economies. The
World Bank projects that 85 million manufacturing jobs will leave China over
the next decade. Where will these jobs go? Can Kenya get a share?
A new way to understand a country’s competitiveness is to
look at the existing composition of exports or “product space”.
Ricardo Hausmann from Harvard University has been spearheading the global analysis of countries’ product spaces, and the World Bank recently hosted him in Kenya. According to him, some countries are richer than others because they have more productive knowledge, which they can use to make more and more complex products. In short, rich countries make a lot of products, including several which only few countries produce. Poor countries only make a few products, and the margins they earn are low because many other nations are also producing them. Realistically, a country will only be able to diversify gradually, moving first to products where a country can apply existing capabilities. Kenya is strong in tea and flowers, but it will have a hard time producing airplanes overnight.
What types of products are within Kenya’s reach, and
which activities are most likely to create the conditions for industry to
invest and expand? There is some light at the end of the tunnel. Kenya has
started to diversify its export products and markets. Three sub-sectors stand
out: textiles (exported mainly to the US), chemicals and machines (to Africa
and Asia). In the 1990s, these exports accounted, on average, for about US$ 120
million in earnings. In the following decade, the figure was four times larger
at US$ 480 million. On an international scale, these are still extremely small
numbers, but they are starting to add up.
Still, Kenya is currently punching below its weight. According to simulations by the Harvard team, Kenya should grow at 7 percent a year. If it did, it would reach Middle Income status by 2018, and remain East Africa’s uncontested economic heavyweight.
We know that Kenya can grow at such levels. It happened in 2007, but the big question is how to sustain the momentum? Can Kenya really grow at 7 percent year after year, including through election turbulence? Can the second engine start pulling its weight? Once it does, sit back, enjoy the flight, and definitely buckle up!
No comments:
Post a Comment